| To: | esumerfd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [cinjug-users] Messaging At the Web Layer |
| From: | "josh marotti" <marotti@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:43:49 -0400 |
| Cc: | CinJug <users@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ZGyxObLXZxntGMn1MyNIifSqzZRPi8YdUFJ/7nQYNGg=; b=EdXeiv+bpV/39eoLfkp4yHFP5C0JCGNVN49gJCeRLfne2voQON6NUGaBqsByJ+dWq6hOLI8DI/qYPb4O7sjx3TRKq8e81Zl9GIKxvU5Z7HKT8CAuPCGzCjcFu2OPXFt2PxEPEcmFopI11M7bubI+CaATbsaNGc6ZbCQiVfqSjmo= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=M5rEhme59hI3TPyB1T0bSm3BtkbJiL8hYiI/nYUxOaZ/sy9DNh5cnpfkgqn/p+IDLLuz6D44jdKS+wjQNb0/jpuuWw7xMegvSqAcpE2dkdjbfFM4xaIB9NJd/evUwy5goufX36fyLJLQ1YGHDJf4DmiLpFPPmz/Il5zLA/oZvno= |
| In-reply-to: | <6a216ba20710231235h730074f7ma164455e7bb8307a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mailing-list: | contact users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <6a216ba20710231235h730074f7ma164455e7bb8307a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
I'm no architect, so I am asking this out of curiosity and for my own knowledge : Why can't the caching and JMS be pushed down to the business layer instead of the web layer? Thanks, Josh On 10/23/07, Edward Sumerfield <esumerfd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am considering implementing a JMS messaging container at the Web layer. > Tell me I am a fool? :-) > > I have a simple web app polled by a client every second for its data. Not > wanting to hit the database for every client, every second, it is cached at > the web layer. > > Enter JMS. We will be receiving notifications of changes to the database > data via JMS messages. So MessageDrivenBeans, deployed to JBoss EJB > container will receive these messages but what should they do to tell the > cache in the Web container to update. > > It seems my options are to push the cache to a java space somewhere so that > the web layer and the MDB's can access it or to move the messaging container > to the web layer. > > Thoughts? > > Ed > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Messaging At the Web Layer, Edward Sumerfield |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [cinjug-users] Messaging At the Web Layer, Paul Spencer |
| Previous by Thread: | Messaging At the Web Layer, Edward Sumerfield |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [cinjug-users] Messaging At the Web Layer, Edward Sumerfield |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |