Hmm... seems as if the group's reply-to field didn't work for me. Re-
sending to everyone.
Binding used correctly (including any blocks for those areas of
disinterest) is great. Binding really only poses problems when you
attempt to bind the entire document because it makes large systems
fragile.
Castor is relatively easy to use; however, it forces Java to look
like XML and is about 10% of the performance of JIBX. JIBX allows
you to map Java to XML naturally while being barely slower than pure
SAX at the expense of a slightly longer learning curve (4-16 hours
depending on the developer).
On Jul 20, 2007, at 10:18 AM, josh marotti wrote:
I'm not a fan of castor, as it is (or, at least, used to be) a code
generator.
I hear the new version of hibernate does XML (in addition to its
standard database) binding, though I haven't used it for that reason.
On 7/20/07, Creighton Kirkendall <ckirkendall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have used Castor a lot and it seems to do a very good job.
Creighton Kirkendall
Director of Technical Development
Hobsons
________________________________
From: Kumar [mailto:kumarkakani@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:10 AM
To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cinjug-users] Open Source XML Data Binding Tools
Hello all,
I am researching open source XML data binding tools for our
project. There
are many options out there. Can anyone compare/suggest a few so
that I can
decide what suits best for our application. We have been using RAD's
(Websphere) in-built bean generator for our past projects. I want
to try
something open source.
Thanks in advance.
Kumar
---------
You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
by sending a blank email addressed to:
users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Find additional help by sending a blank email
addressed to:
users-help@xxxxxxxxxx
|