| To: | jim_garrett@xxxxxxxx, users@xxxxxxxxxx, twcrone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [cinjug-users] Ajax frameworks |
| From: | Abdul Habra <ahabra@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:42:43 -0800 (PST) |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list users@cinjug.org |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=YyL2r9xR2dG+Uo/CHfQZ8OeMZbjcL2Mv8chlvsjulophHlYADzvoNobwSL+f3q/J4rGiAWzxaxYFQEFTx6+bt9dTZ/7wO7W0/+rKQrILK/zU0xOblEMIZRuYe3xR5FdJAqQ5VpuDISlPdEe4GSgurfKQEEOrVpIORrTW7x3igQM=; |
| In-reply-to: | <11685054.1170875437377.JavaMail.root@wmvirt55> |
| Mailing-list: | contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm |
|
Jim, You are right about the server calls, basically almost all your events are handled at the server. This was my concern when I started playing with Echo. I used Echo1 with several 10's of concurrent users < 100 concurrent users, on a generic Windows 2K server (no fancy hardware) running Tomcat, with a few other similar apps on the same server. Performance was
reasonable. With Echo2 being As I stated earlier, I have not used Echo2 in a production env. to report a personal experience. However, from what I read, its performance should be even better than Echo1. At any rate, I do not think its performance should be different from other
I will be glad to hear if anybody has any production experience with Echo2. This brings another non-technical concern about Echo that we should keep in mind. No matter how cool or fast it is, there are not many people who use it. For a project manager it is much easier to find somebody who has struts/jsf/tapestery? with an Abdul jim_garrett@xxxxxxxx wrote: As I understand Echo2, every click of the screen could require a server call to resolve the action being done. Can you comment on how well Echo2 performed on a system with several hundred simultaneous users?
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [cinjug-users] Ajax frameworks, Timothy Dennison |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [cinjug-users] Ajax frameworks, Rogelio Flores |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [cinjug-users] Ajax frameworks, jim_garrett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [cinjug-users] Ajax frameworks, Timothy Dennison |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |