| To: | "users@xxxxxxxxxx" <users@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | EJBObject and EJBLocalIObject interfaces |
| From: | "Edward Sumerfield" <esumerfd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:27:30 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list users@cinjug.org |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=V1DqTRo/ombU+DLQNndslcuD/vTQ1o3SQZDNW9+Urqy8Br0Sws5u7iuchSIVkQvO5YNKNhBwFtzGUPDoyIXRnaBiMczEtT09zTr+iZ0vqKnuSY+B706iK9n2JBJd0PRYjUcR4SbsHHw/kWJQwYR9LbQgYD5x7HO0Vd81ffA1gas= |
| Mailing-list: | contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm |
| Reply-to: | esumerfd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | esumerfd@xxxxxxxxx |
Anyone have any fancy ways of removing the duplication between these two interfaces? One needs to throw the RemoteException and the local does not. Makes sence in theory but it means duping every method in every bean. I could go code generation, copy from EJBObject to EJBLocalObject and filter out the "throws RemoteException" string. Should be a simple ant task but someone must have solved this inefficiency already? -- Ed |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | CinJUG erubycon discount, Rob Biedenharn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [cinjug-users] EJBObject and EJBLocalIObject interfaces, Abraham Fathman |
| Previous by Thread: | CinJUG erubycon discount, Rob Biedenharn |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [cinjug-users] EJBObject and EJBLocalIObject interfaces, Abraham Fathman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |