users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [cinjug-users] Hibernate mapping extra data in link tables

To: "Trey Howard" <trey.howard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cinjug-users] Hibernate mapping extra data in link tables
From: "James Carman" <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:31:07 -0500
Cc: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mailing list users@cinjug.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=HD3ToZINndAAWVaDxE/25KmISNwbVsW1iXEbLxQJ4khnn/PkpZr+PdJ7Cdp59MhxybjXamb/BGDTYvb+N+70RzhBwi3RfdtT213CESSc8STYxKaRO1D5ysW2vkTF+dJFrogSIN0rBZ1L75EGoHew2tICO2wtqFDKa6bwsInit4o=
In-reply-to: <4550B4B3.4060104@digilore.com>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm
References: <f73bb58e1e300.454f67c2@insightbb.com> <DC1C7328E353C14589E9613E46F919F1EDE9C7@s000pex03.HaverstickConsulting.com> <4550B4B3.4060104@digilore.com>
Sender: jwcarman@xxxxxxxxx
Yes, you have to have a class there to hold the relationship data.


On 11/7/06, Trey Howard <trey.howard@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I agree with Brian's solution--that's the only solution I'm familiar with.
I'm not sure what else would make sense, since if you don't have a class
for ABRelation, then how can you access the additional information on
the relationship?

Todd, if you find a better solution, please post it here.

-Trey


Forsythe, Brian wrote: > What are you expecting the resultant object model to look like? The most straightforward solution sounds like you'd have three classes: A, B, and ABRelationship. > > ________________________________ > > From: twcrone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:twcrone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Mon 11/6/2006 4:50 PM > To: users@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [cinjug-users] Hibernate mapping extra data in link tables > > > I know I have seen this somewhere but I can't find it... > > I need to have a link table that not only specifies a relationship but some information specific to that relationship that is not specific to either entity in the relationship. So I have a link table that I need to have more data other than simply the IDs of the two entities that are related. > > I think there is a way to add a object that will specify the extra data in the link but I can't remember the example I saw on this. > > Anyone done this before? > > - Todd > > > --------- > You may unsubscribe from this mailing list > by sending a blank email addressed to: > users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx > > -- > Find additional help by sending a blank email > addressed to: > users-help@xxxxxxxxxx > > >

---------
You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
by sending a blank email addressed to:
users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx

--
Find additional help by sending a blank email
addressed to:
users-help@xxxxxxxxxx



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>