I agree with Brian's solution--that's the only solution I'm familiar with.
I'm not sure what else would make sense, since if you don't have a class
for ABRelation, then how can you access the additional information on
the relationship?
Todd, if you find a better solution, please post it here.
-Trey
Forsythe, Brian wrote:
> What are you expecting the resultant object model to look like? The most
> straightforward solution sounds like you'd have three classes: A, B, and
> ABRelationship.
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: twcrone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:twcrone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Mon 11/6/2006 4:50 PM
> To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cinjug-users] Hibernate mapping extra data in link tables
>
>
> I know I have seen this somewhere but I can't find it...
>
> I need to have a link table that not only specifies a relationship but some
> information specific to that relationship that is not specific to either
> entity in the relationship. So I have a link table that I need to have more
> data other than simply the IDs of the two entities that are related.
>
> I think there is a way to add a object that will specify the extra data in
> the link but I can't remember the example I saw on this.
>
> Anyone done this before?
>
> - Todd
>
>
> ---------
> You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
> by sending a blank email addressed to:
> users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> --
> Find additional help by sending a blank email
> addressed to:
> users-help@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
|