| To: | <users@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [cinjug-users] Brandan Jones Presentation |
| From: | "Forsythe, Brian" <Brian.Forsythe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:35:44 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list users@cinjug.org |
| Mailing-list: | contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <6a216ba20610171339q36dd1b33k193430f4f735b30b@mail.gmail.com><d4dd9080610282013v13d36e74k1c2d28fb8d93f1fb@mail.gmail.com><6a216ba20610300619tbaee4c9j54b97e2fb93da193@mail.gmail.com><d4dd9080610310435h6cff265ak69e9ee839ddceafe@mail.gmail.com><6a216ba20610310537y525a89c4md58685729287a791@mail.gmail.com><d4dd9080610312001k12c35aa0ycf8da2daef1275b9@mail.gmail.com><454821BA.9090207@members.simunex.com> <6a216ba20611010529g2ebe546fg2fb379b71f507754@mail.gmail.com> |
| Thread-index: | Acb9ufGaC1K7cl/fQRaQITs4kcFS/QAIQ6FK |
| Thread-topic: | [cinjug-users] Brandan Jones Presentation |
A few salient points re the discussion that sometimes get forgotten in the mix (or are misunderstood): - There's nothing stopping you from catching an unchecked exception (so your exception handling code will be the same if you *choose* to handle it). - There's nothing stopping you from declaring an unchecked exception (i.e. public void myMethod() throws MyUncheckedException). It's a best practice, IMHO. Seems to me that our modern development tools have largely eliminated the need for checked exceptions. If I were still shelling out of my text editor to command-line compile, I'd probably be all for them. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Cinjug Nov 20th - Maven 2.0, Mike Ball |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | :SPAM: Notification: Loww ratess, Javier Kenny |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [cinjug-users] Brandan Jones Presentation, Edward Sumerfield |
| Next by Thread: | Cinjug Nov 20th - Maven 2.0, Mike Ball |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |