users
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [cinjug-users] JBoss

To: <twcrone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cinjug-users] JBoss
From: "Robert Casto" <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:03:50 -0700
Delivered-to: mailing list users@cinjug.org
In-reply-to: <f685baf78385.4524de2d@insightbb.com>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm
Thread-index: AcboioiCyTi6yyEgQ5O8p47fY9aX7QADN/Qg

They have been quite innovative and are causing the big guys to take notice. Branding is something they have to do to make money and stay alive. Oracle wants this market and sees that they can take the best from it and put it into their Oracle server which caters to the big companies. It is too risky to try new things there, but in JBoss the customer is more used to innovation and more frequent changes.

 

I think JBoss has become a much more serious contender in the SMB market. They can’t play with the big boys, but then they are too expensive and require too much work to fit the SMB model.

 

Robert Casto
robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change happens. Plan for it!


From: twcrone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:twcrone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:28 AM
To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cinjug-users] JBoss

 

What does everyone generally think about JBoss as an app server?  What does everyone think about them "branding" the technologies that they incorporate (e.g. JBoss Rules, JBoss Seam)?  Do they have some relationship with Oracle now?  Just curious...

Thanks,

- Todd

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>