users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [cinjug-users] Web page design tool

To: Troy Davis <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cinjug-users] Web page design tool
From: <twcrone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:01:13 -0400
Cc: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mailing list users@cinjug.org
In-reply-to: <04939050-2C8C-49C4-A72C-77E69C2DEEA6@metaphorstudio.com>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm
Priority: normal
References: <f683ceb2f666.451a6b6c@insightbb.com> <04939050-2C8C-49C4-A72C-77E69C2DEEA6@metaphorstudio.com>
Yes, thank you.

----- Original Message -----
From: Troy Davis <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 15:11
Subject: Re: [cinjug-users] Web page design tool
To: twcrone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: users@xxxxxxxxxx

> Are your custom tags legal xhtml syntax?  If so, you should
> be able 
> to use any XHTML editor.
>
> Personally I'm partial to Adobe GoLive. Plenty of people
> like 
> DreamWeaver, but I think its interface belongs in a museum. I've
> also 
> used a couple of open source HTML editors, Nvu and Bluefish.
> GoLive, 
> DreamWeaver and Nvu have WYSIWYG editors, which are very helpful
> with 
> complex layouts. Bluefish doesn't have this feature, it's just a
> code 
> editor optimized for (X)HTML.
>
> But if you just want a nice code editor, take a look at BBEdit
> if 
> you're on a Mac, or UltraEdit for Windows. Both are commercial
> products.
> But none of these products are IDEs, just web page layout and/or
> text 
> editors. If you want HTML authoring inside an IDE, I'd
> recommend 
> eclipse with EclipseHTMLEditor. I hear NetBeans has
> something 
> similar, as does myEclipse.
>
> Does that help at all?
>
> Cheers,
> Troy
> __________________
> Troy Davis
> Chief Technology Officer
> Metaphor Studio
> 538 Reading Road
> Loft 200
> Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
>
> Tel: 513-723-0290
> Fax: 513-723-0670
> http://metaphorstudio.com
>
>
> On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:15 PM, <twcrone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > What IDE's does everyone use to create nice looking,
> XHTML 
> > compliant pages that won't mess up custom tags etc.?
> >
> > - Todd
>
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>