users
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [cinjug-users] Product Keys

To: <deshmol-lists@xxxxxxxxx>, <users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cinjug-users] Product Keys
From: "James Carman" <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:33:57 -0400
Delivered-to: mailing list users@cinjug.org
In-reply-to: <20060811152221.61363.qmail@web32009.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm
Thread-index: Aca9WfZi7EICHA3ZQYCmpQbkQNthdgAAYxEQ
It would definitely help, but hackers can crack almost anything.

-----Original Message-----
From: deshmol-lists@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:deshmol-lists@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:22 AM
To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cinjug-users] Product Keys

since part of the problem is that java can be
decompiled so easily, i wonder if using jni for the
licensing code could help.

~ amol

--- James Carman <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is somewhat dated, but I found it a very
> interesting read when I was
> considering how to write a licensing service for my
> Java code.  It's
> somewhat depressing:
> 
>  
> 
> http://www.cigital.com/hostile-applets/maginot.html
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: Scott Hofmann [mailto:shofmann@xxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 7:06 AM
> To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cinjug-users] Product Keys
> 
>  
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I'm involved in a software product being developed
> in Java and wondered if
> anyone here has had any experience with product keys
> and registrations?  I'm
> hearing from the developer that to do registration:
> 
>  
> 
> "From my research online, it looks like the only
> truly secure way is to have
> a license server.  The software would then connect
> to the license server to
> ensure that it is legitimate.  However, this seems
> like an expensive
> solution as it requires *much* more development work
> in addition to having
> another server to maintain."
> 
>  
> 
> Sooo... I'm trying to identify ways others are doing
> their product keys or
> have heard of doing them. We really do not need a
> truly secure key. The
> product will sell for under $50. What we need we
> think is just a simple
> solution that help to: 
> 
>  
> 
> - Keep people honest and not feeling to free about
> passing along copies to
> other.
> 
> - Being able to provide support to those who truly
> purchased the product.
> 
> - Most likely we would not trouble ourselves with
> those people who are
> dishonest and feel the need to find loop hole in
> software product keys in
> order to use it anyway.
> 
>  
> 
> Any advice or thoughts on this topic would be
> helpful.
> 
>  
> 
> - Scott Hofmann
> 
>  
> 
> 


---------
You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
by sending a blank email addressed to:
users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx

--
Find additional help by sending a blank email
addressed to:
users-help@xxxxxxxxxx



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>