My apologies to Mark, I meant to send to the list... :) Fatfingers!
On Friday 25 February 2005 02:45 pm, Mark Windholtz wrote:
> > Hence, is this a case where use of a constant doesn't imply DP ?
>
> I'd rather say that DP solves this problem better than distributed
> objects. (Oh that hurt my fingers to type.)
And I would say that if you are forced into considering this kind of
implementation detail, your framework does not let you express things on a
sufficiently abstract level. It's like making the decision of whether to
hoist a calculation out of a loop. Didn't compilers take care of that for us
in the '70s?
Not that I immediately know of any frameworks that would readily let me do
this...
Marc.
> So sorry, Constants still imply DP.
>
> --
> Regards,
> -Mark
>
> ---------
> You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
> by sending a blank email addressed to:
> users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> --
> Find additional help by sending a blank email
> addressed to:
> users-help@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Marc Ramirez
Blue Circle Software Corporation
513-688-1070 (main)
513-382-1270 (direct)
http://www.bluecirclesoft.com
http://www.mrami.com (personal)
pgpJgEXJZoxAz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|