users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [cinjug-users] Does corp. America still trust Java?

To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cinjug-users] Does corp. America still trust Java?
From: Mark Windholtz <windholtz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:53:12 -0500
Cc: yevgeny@xxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mailing list users@cinjug.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=TAHQ/9dkgG3ZHYRcwdtA3TCGwr7ZTEH9qO0vQneJIbk7TCv2hKexYX5Pr18HvXbJ5t1CMRvAvRALSn5F35hrBIHg+gBw1vBOu85IDDjgzh4Pbxu+9TjAecG7YjPgyHhR1Dwk6aVIu3AKlTuXHGPYGZ9WjI9KfWn6CVDU3r2QHsg=
In-reply-to: <47260.216.68.236.9.1109269671.squirrel@216.68.236.9>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm
References: <20050214171845.29476.qmail@web30702.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <BAY101-F145278522B716EAF9E5B04CC620@phx.gbl> <47260.216.68.236.9.1109269671.squirrel@216.68.236.9>
Reply-to: Mark Windholtz <windholtz@xxxxxxxxx>
Yevgeny wrote:
> 
> my company is being constantly asked for .Net related services anymore.
> Whether it is putting together a .Net Architecture or simple development,
> it is mostly on the MS side and barely ever on J2EE one.

 Most Java/J2EE applications are written in a Data Processing (DP) style.
 Rather than an OO style.
 I'd say over 90% of the java Ibeing written is DP-oriented.

 At the end of my talk, I asked:
 Since most development is in DP style, 
 is Java really the best choice for building DP programs???

 That's why I called the talk COBOL oriented J2EE.
 You can't (probably shouldn't) build OO apps in a DP culture.

 It may take a .NET person to answer then,  if .NET is either:
 (1) better at building DP-style applications
 (2) has a better OO requirements culture.

 Any one have an answer?  (guesses also accepted).

-- 
Regards,
-Mark
(513) 226 8259

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>