| To: | <users@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [cinjug-users] Does corp. America still trust Java? |
| From: | "Edward Sumerfield" <esumerfd@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:28:42 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list users@cinjug.org |
| Mailing-list: | contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <20050214171845.29476.qmail@web30702.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <BAY101-F145278522B716EAF9E5B04CC620@phx.gbl> <47260.216.68.236.9.1109269671.squirrel@216.68.236.9> <3a4860b405022411531b2b38d1@mail.gmail.com> |
|
I am so sorry that I missed the talk Monday. So I have to be one of the
guessers. Assuming your reference to "DP style" development relates to more transaction oriented design, then java and C# are identical. Both can be used in either way. Java is still ahead of the game as far as infrastructure goes but the capabilities are the same you just have to write a little more in .Net. You said that "most development is in DP style". Why does this imply that a language is more or less biased toward that style just because that's what people do with it? Why can I not apply my OO design techniques to my DP app? If missing the presentation has made these statements seem ridiculous then please ignore. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Windholtz" <windholtz@xxxxxxxxx> To: <users@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <yevgeny@xxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [cinjug-users] Does corp. America still trust Java? Yevgeny wrote: |
| Previous by Date: | RE: [cinjug-users] Does corp. America still trust Java?, Witt, Mike (OH35) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [cinjug-users] Does corp. America still trust Java?, Michael Schneider |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [cinjug-users] Does corp. America still trust Java?, Mark Windholtz |
| Next by Thread: | DP in J2EE (was: Does corp. America still trust Java?), Mark Windholtz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |