| To: | <users@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [cinjug-users] Does corp. America still trust Java? |
| From: | "Edward Sumerfield" <esumerfd@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:52:23 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list users@cinjug.org |
| Mailing-list: | contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <20050214171845.29476.qmail@web30702.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <BAY101-F145278522B716EAF9E5B04CC620@phx.gbl> <47260.216.68.236.9.1109269671.squirrel@216.68.236.9> |
|
Initially I noticed the same thing but there are lots of good reasons for
it. Firstly, anyone that used to ask for ASP web site development is not
asking for .Net development since its just a name change to most people.
Lots of Access/Office style products are looking for a migration path to
something more robust. They have always been there but not they are saying
.Net. I am a consultant and long time javaist but am now working my second .Net contract in 6 months. Both are small fat clients. One will be using a remoting server and database. There are still lots of java projects out there. Most of the large scale stuff I see is still java. That is not to say that .Net will not catch up. I have no doubt that it will, it's better in some situations and in many others its worse so it can't kill java, just change the balance. At the end of the day it just means that we have more ways to play with computers. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yevgeny A. Smolyansky" <yevgeny@xxxxxxx> To: <users@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 1:27 PM Subject: [cinjug-users] Does corp. America still trust Java? Cinjugers, |
| Previous by Date: | Does corp. America still trust Java?, Yevgeny A. Smolyansky |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [cinjug-users] Does corp. America still trust Java?, Mark Windholtz |
| Previous by Thread: | Does corp. America still trust Java?, Yevgeny A. Smolyansky |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [cinjug-users] Does corp. America still trust Java?, Mark Windholtz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |