users
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [cinjug-users] Centrino

To: users@xxxxxxxxxx, "Arnett, Matt" <Matt.Arnett@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cinjug-users] Centrino
From: Greg Williams <gregw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:52:34 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: mailing list users@cinjug.org
In-reply-to: <AB75441401112747806E7AC8A7E87D7F240093@c092ex02.na.cintas.com>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm
References: <AB75441401112747806E7AC8A7E87D7F240093@c092ex02.na.cintas.com>
User-agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.5
Here's a comparison from Intel's website:

http://www.intel.com/products/benchmarks/notebook/index.htm?bm=cmt_centrino_nbbm

Looks like a 1.7 Centrino is faster and has longer battery life than a mobile P4
2.6.  In my experience it doesn't get as hot either.

Greg

Quoting "Arnett, Matt" <Matt.Arnett@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> After reading my original post I forgot to list an app server running
> too, probably WebLogic 8 or 9.
> 
> I plan to get 1 gig or ram but anymore than that gets really pricey.
> 
> My biggest hang-up on the Centrino is that for the price of a 1.6 to 2.0
> GHz, I could get a standard
> HT 3.0 GHz processor for about the same money.  But it sounds like a
> Pentium M 1.6 is fairly
> comparable in speed to a HT 3.0.  Not sure how Intel pulled that off.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Matt
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: robert.cheek@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:robert.cheek@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:24 AM
> To: Arnett, Matt
> Subject: Re: [cinjug-users] Centrino
> 
> We're not using Centrino, per se (our policy prohibits wireless devices
> on
> the laptops we order), but we're running Pentium M 1.6GHz laptops with
> 2GB
> of RAM, and they are comparable in speed and performance to our 3GHz
> minitowers (also 2GB of RAM, SATA disks, etc.). We run a 18,000 class
> java
> app in WebSphere, ClearCase, Lotus Notes, WSAD, DB2, and assorted
> other
> miscellaney without any problem. Probably the worst thing about it is
> that
> the disk subsystem is slower than the towers, so startup times are
> longer
> for the apps, but once they're running, you're good.
> 
> We ordered both towers and laptops for some of our senior guys just
> because
> of that concern, and all of them have pretty much abandoned the towers
> due
> to the fact that the performance is so similar.
> 
> --
> Rob Cheek
> Work: 513-979-1693  Pager: 888-444-6207  2Way: 8884446207@xxxxxxxxxx
> Mobile: 513-227-5377
> 
> 
> |---------+---------------------------->
> |         |           "Arnett, Matt"   |
> |         |           <Matt.Arnett@cint|
> |         |           as.com>          |
> |         |                            |
> |         |           02/10/2005 08:48 |
> |         |           AM               |
> |         |           Please respond to|
> |         |           users            |
> |         |                            |
> |---------+---------------------------->
>  
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------|
>   |
> |
>   |       To:       users@xxxxxxxxxx
> |
>   |       cc:
> |
>   |       Subject:  [cinjug-users] Centrino
> |
>  
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------|
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry, I don't have any free gmail accounts to offer :-0
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Does anyone know how the Centrino processor based laptops perform for
> typical java development work?  i.e. running and IDE, a DB server, ant
> (cranking away at unit tests), maybe a couple other apps running.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> If you have any links that compare non-centrino to centrino
> performance
> that would help too.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> -Matt
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to be
> confidential and privileged. If you receive this e-mail and you are not
> a
> named addressee you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to
> read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this communication without
> the
> consent of the sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be
> unlawful.
> Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that
> the
> message was misdirected. After replying, please delete and otherwise
> erase
> it and any attachments from your computer system. Your assistance in
> correcting this error is appreciated. Thank you. Cintas Corporation.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains
> information that is, or may be,
> covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also
> confidential and proprietary in nature.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are
> legally prohibited from
> retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this
> information in any manner.
> Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this
> communication in error, and then
> immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
> ==============================================================================
> 
> This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to be
> confidential and privileged.  If you receive this e-mail and you are not
> a named addressee you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to
> read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this communication without the
> consent of the sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be
> unlawful.  Please reply to the message immediately by informing the
> sender that the message was misdirected.  After replying, please delete
> and otherwise erase it and any attachments from your computer system. 
> Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.  Thank you. 
> Cintas Corporation.
> 
> 
> ---------
> You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
> by sending a blank email addressed to:
> users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> --
> Find additional help by sending a blank email
> addressed to:
> users-help@xxxxxxxxxx
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>