| To: | Jim Cook <jimcook@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [cinjug-users] Constants imply DP (was: Question on last Monday's meeting) |
| From: | Mark Windholtz <windholtz@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:45:07 -0500 |
| Cc: | CinJug <users@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list users@cinjug.org |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Mqjh4URSyWUfSAXOaU231ud2wx9DUrgjxtp5pY/m34IH3ow/hQCJwR9vCBntiWetWC3hOrD6hLA0SIrgDwTIldESlOAgCy+lRvw+z/aSq2MiaYU9JGry6puXSgwRwo1+t0vXuBQn3KedbAf6DftsRibJokRId71rj9r74r57DsY= |
| In-reply-to: | <20050225193821.UVDE2296.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@MARS1> |
| Mailing-list: | contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <1C8557C418C561429998C1F8FBB283A728BAE7@MSGDALCLB2WIN.DMN1.FMR.COM> <20050225193821.UVDE2296.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@MARS1> |
| Reply-to: | Mark Windholtz <windholtz@xxxxxxxxx> |
> > Hence, is this a case where use of a constant doesn't imply DP ? > I'd rather say that DP solves this problem better than distributed objects. (Oh that hurt my fingers to type.) So sorry, Constants still imply DP. -- Regards, -Mark |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [cinjug-users] Constants imply DP (was: Question on last Monday's meeting), Jim Cook |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [cinjug-users] Constants imply DP (was: Question on last Monday's meeting), Jim Cook |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [cinjug-users] Constants imply DP (was: Question on last Monday's meeting), Jim Cook |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [cinjug-users] Constants imply DP (was: Question on last Monday's meeting), Jim Cook |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |