Jason,
You are correct. Here's the excerpt from
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnnetdep/ht
ml/dotnetfxredisteula1_1.asp
==========
You may not disclose the results of any benchmark test of the .NET Framework
component of the OS Components to any third party without Microsoft's prior
written approval.
==========
--
I'm tellin,
Randy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Kretzer [mailto:jrkretzer@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 8:23 AM
> To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cinjug-users] [Fwd: Performance comparison of Java (and
> .NET) runtimes]
>
>
> I hope he got permission. IIRC, according to the .NET
> EULA, you are not allowed to do benchmarking for
> comparison on .NET with out Microsoft permission.
>
> Someone correct me if I am wrong please.
>
> -Jason
>
> --- Matt Avery <mavery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > For those of you who are not also on the Blackdown
> > list, this guy did a
> > nice job on his performance benchmarks. His focus
> > is numerics, so you
> > won't find anything about Swing or serialization
> > performance.
> >
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> >
> >
> > I have updated a web page showing results of
> > performance measurement of
> > various Java runtimes.
> >
> > Performance Comparison of Java/.NET Runtimes (Oct
> > 2004)
> > http://www.shudo.net/jit/perf/
> >
> > The benchmarks on the page are mainly compute
> > intensive and not
> > server-side ones: SPEC JVM98, SciMark 2.0, Linpack
> > benchmark and
> > Eratosthenes sieve. Such benchmark results seem not
> > to be in much
> > demand these days but recently released JDK 5.0
> > pushed me into doing
> > performance measurement.
> >
> > This time Opteron processor (with 64 bit and 32 bit
> > binaries) was
> > tested in addition to Pentium 4. Another
> > interesting point is .NET
> > Framework, which was tested with simple benchmarks
> > ported to C#.
> >
> > Possibly interesting points are:
> >
> > - C#/.NET performance
> >
> > - Startup process and/or JIT compilation may be
> > heavier than
> > Java runtimes including HotSpot Server VM.
> >
> > - Throughput of .NET Framework is pretty high.
> > C#/.NET shown higher performance than HotSpot
> > Server VM
> > in Linpack benchmark with large data.
> >
> > - Difference between 64 bit (AMD64) code and 32
> > bit (x86) code on Opteron
> >
> > - 64 bit code is faster in some benchmarks, and
> > in other
> > benchmarks 32 bit code is faster.
> >
> > - 64 bit code should pay the penalty of larger
> > pointer (reference)
> > and benefit (a little ?) from faster 64 bit
> > integer arithmetic.
> >
> > Hope you enjoy,
> >
> > Kazuyuki Shudo shudo@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.shudo.net/
> >
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> > java-linux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Avery
> > Senior Developer
> > (513) 470-5316
> > http://www.einnovation.com/
> >
> > ---------
> > You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
> > by sending a blank email addressed to:
> > users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > --
> > Find additional help by sending a blank email
> > addressed to:
> > users-help@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
> ---------
> You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
> by sending a blank email addressed to:
> users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> --
> Find additional help by sending a blank email
> addressed to:
> users-help@xxxxxxxxxx
>
|