users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [cinjug-users] [Fwd: Performance comparison of Java (and .NET) runti

To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cinjug-users] [Fwd: Performance comparison of Java (and .NET) runtimes]
From: Jason Kretzer <jrkretzer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 05:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-to: mailing list users@cinjug.org
In-reply-to: <417500AD.7090603@einnovation.com>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm
I hope he got permission.  IIRC, according to the .NET
EULA, you are not allowed to do benchmarking for
comparison on .NET with out Microsoft permission.

Someone correct me if I am wrong please.

-Jason

--- Matt Avery <mavery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> For those of you who are not also on the Blackdown
> list, this guy did a 
> nice job on his performance benchmarks.  His focus
> is numerics, so you 
> won't find anything about Swing or serialization
> performance.
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> 
> 
> I have updated a web page showing results of
> performance measurement of
> various Java runtimes.
> 
>    Performance Comparison of Java/.NET Runtimes (Oct
> 2004)
>    http://www.shudo.net/jit/perf/
> 
> The benchmarks on the page are mainly compute
> intensive and not
> server-side ones: SPEC JVM98, SciMark 2.0, Linpack
> benchmark and
> Eratosthenes sieve.  Such benchmark results seem not
> to be in much
> demand these days but recently released JDK 5.0
> pushed me into doing
> performance measurement.
> 
> This time Opteron processor (with 64 bit and 32 bit
> binaries) was
> tested in addition to Pentium 4.  Another
> interesting point is .NET
> Framework, which was tested with simple benchmarks
> ported to C#.
> 
> Possibly interesting points are:
> 
>    - C#/.NET performance
> 
>      - Startup process and/or JIT compilation may be
> heavier than
>        Java runtimes including HotSpot Server VM.
> 
>      - Throughput of .NET Framework is pretty high.
>        C#/.NET shown higher performance than HotSpot
> Server VM
>        in Linpack benchmark with large data.
> 
>    - Difference between 64 bit (AMD64) code and 32
> bit (x86) code on Opteron
> 
>      - 64 bit code is faster in some benchmarks, and
> in other
>        benchmarks 32 bit code is faster.
> 
>      - 64 bit code should pay the penalty of larger
> pointer (reference)
>        and benefit (a little ?) from faster 64 bit
> integer arithmetic.
> 
> Hope you enjoy,
> 
>    Kazuyuki Shudo     shudo@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.shudo.net/
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> java-linux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Avery
> Senior Developer
> (513) 470-5316
> http://www.einnovation.com/
> 
> ---------
> You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
> by sending a blank email addressed to:
> users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> --
> Find additional help by sending a blank email
> addressed to:
> users-help@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 



                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>