users
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: FW: [cinjug-users] newbie trying to learn m-v-c

To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: FW: [cinjug-users] newbie trying to learn m-v-c
From: Greg Williams <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 17:32:38 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-to: mailing list users@cinjug.org
In-reply-to: <28919746D11E5441A98ABF710A8ECEE50F9DBDFE@c092ex02.na.cintas.com>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm
References: <28919746D11E5441A98ABF710A8ECEE50F9DBDFE@c092ex02.na.cintas.com>
User-agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.5
Oh whew, for a minute there, I thought you were going to be one of the 
hundreds that told him to cast to a String. :-)

Greg

Quoting "Arnett, Matt" <Matt.Arnett@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> After attending the NFJS conference and hearing the talks on Tapestry
> and JSF (a lot of negative
> comments, some even from one of the creators, David Geary, of JSF), I
> would probably rank them in this
> order:
> 
> Tapestry
> Struts
> JSF (JavaServerFaces)
> 
> I have never used WebWork so I could not rank this one.
> 
> Is anyone actually using JSF out there?  What has your experience
> been?
> 
> -Matt
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Nelson [mailto:cnelson4eii@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 4:49 PM
> To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: FW: [cinjug-users] newbie trying to learn m-v-c
> 
> You probably want to use one of the many web
> application frameworks out there rather than
> hand-coding servlets and JSPs from scratch.  There
> are, of course, a dizzying array to choose from. 
> Currently, I would look at:
> 
> Tapestry
> WebWork
> JSF (JavaServerFaces)
> Struts
> 
> in that order.  Of these, I have the most experience
> with Struts, but believe the others to be better
> choices for a brand new app.  Though getting started
> with one of these will be a bit of a learning curve at
> first, you will end up with far less code to write,
> and more importantly, maintain.
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> --Chris
> 
> --- sdgesa gaeharth <pollux1234567890@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > Yes it does make sense!! I tried this(see below) and
> > it seems to work!!. Thanks!!! My next problem is
> > obvious.  I have to put the "if statement" anywhere
> > I
> > out.print members of the formToValidate object, or
> > else I get an error. Is there a way to write this so
> > there is no scripting on the jsp page, like putting
> > the new validatedForm object into a JSTL tag ? This
> > leads into my next question.  Am I designing this
> > app
> > corectlly or is there a better way to do what I am
> > doing.
> > 
> > thanks again
> > 
> > <jsp:include page="/header.jsp" />
> > <%@ taglib prefix="c"
> > uri="http://java.sun.com/jstl/core"%>
> > <%@ page import="java.util.*,
> > com.bdi.www.members.MemberValidateForm" %>
> > <%if (request.getAttribute("formToValidate") !=
> > null){
> >     MemberValidateForm validatedForm =
> > (MemberValidateForm)
> > request.getAttribute("formToValidate");
> > }%>
> > ...
> > 
> > 
> >     
> >             
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
> > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
> > 
> > ---------
> > You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
> > by sending a blank email addressed to:
> > users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > --
> > Find additional help by sending a blank email
> > addressed to:
> > users-help@xxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>               
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
> 
> ---------
> You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
> by sending a blank email addressed to:
> users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> --
> Find additional help by sending a blank email
> addressed to:
> users-help@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> ---------
> You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
> by sending a blank email addressed to:
> users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> --
> Find additional help by sending a blank email
> addressed to:
> users-help@xxxxxxxxxx
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>