users
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [cinjug-users] WebApps: how not to deploy?

To: <users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cinjug-users] WebApps: how not to deploy?
From: "James Carman" <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:05:30 -0400
Delivered-to: mailing list users@cinjug.org
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <307F1DEF652C2E4C95428E27611FB228021310FC@cceexc14.americas.cpqcorp.net>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm
Organization: Carman Consulting, Inc.

However, if that servlet class was compiled using the JDK 1.4 compiler, it would throw an error, because the JVM wouldn’t know how to load the class.  You need to tell your compiler to compile your classes so that they are compatible with the 1.3 releases.  They can still depend upon the 1.4-specific classes, but the class file format would be compatible with the older JVMs.  That way, the worst thing that could happen would probably be a ClassNotFoundException unless you’re using assertions.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mascolino, Mark R. [mailto:mark.mascolino@xxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 3:59 PM
To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cinjug-users] WebApps: how not to deploy?

 

I don't believe that there is any cross-app server way of having an app veto its deployment.  The best you could do is a load-on-startup servlet that checked things out and threw a ServletException in the case that everything wasn't ok.  Not perfect, but at least you should get a failure message right away.

Mark Mascolino
Hewlett Packard
Managed Services - GTS
eBusiness Services - P&G Cincinnati
+1 513.983.4714
mark.mascolino@xxxxxx

The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Hewlett Packard Company confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

-----Original Message-----
From: Herbers, Joe [mailto:herbers@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 3:48 PM
To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cinjug-users] WebApps: how not to deploy?

Let’s say you have a web application that requires Java 1.4.  Is there a good way to prevent it from deploying on an appserver if the appserver is only running 1.3?

 

What I’ve noticed by default on at least one appserver is that you won’t see an issue till a client hits a JSP page that references a class file, at which point the client gets a message like “The major.minor version '48.0' is too recent for this tool to understand.”

 

This isn’t very clear!  Rather than this appearing to the first user who hits the server, we’re thinking perhaps it would be better to print an error message on startup.  However, since the output may be buried in a log file somewhere (for example on Oracle 9i’s AppServer) it seems like the only way to get attention is to prevent deployment of the war as well.  What do you think?

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>