users
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [cinjug-users] odd db2 insert behavior

To: "James Carman" <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cinjug-users] odd db2 insert behavior
From: "Jason Kretzer/STAR BASE Consulting Inc." <JKretzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 10:05:59 -0400
Cc: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mailing list users@cinjug.org
In-reply-to: <000201c43117$501af7d0$6501a8c0@carmani600m>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm

DOH, my mistake, I meant executeUpdate instead of executeQuery.  executeUpdate is what I actually have in my code.

-Jason



"James Carman" <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

05/03/2004 10:02 AM

To
"'Jason Kretzer/STAR BASE Consulting Inc.'" <JKretzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <users@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [cinjug-users] odd db2 insert behavior





As far as style goes, I would use a PreparedStatement for performance AND safetyâ
 
PreparedStatement ps = connection.prepareStatement( âinsert into some_table(some_pri_key,some_other_value) values (?,âbobâ)â );
for( int i = 0; i < 400; ++i )
{
  ps.setInt( 1, i );
  ps.executeUpdate();
  connection.commit();
}
 
You should also be using executeUpdate() rather than executeQuery(), if youâre doing an update.  Also, you should probably consider not committing after each insert and putting a bunch of inserts into one commit.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From:
Jason Kretzer/STAR BASE Consulting Inc. [mailto:JKretzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:
Monday, May 03, 2004 9:42 AM
To:
users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
[cinjug-users] odd db2 insert behavior

 

Good morning all,



I have a class that populates a db2 database.  Here is a basic sample of what I am doing.


for(int i=0; i<400; i++)

{

       stmt.executeQuery("INSERT INTO SOME_TABLE (SOME_PRI_KEY, SOME_OTHER_VALUE) VALUES ("+i+",'bob')");

       connection.commit();

}


First of all, how bad is the style of this?  Secondly, when I insert like this and then get the contents of the table, I get something similar to this



SOME_PRI_KEY        SOME OTHER VALUE

385                        bob

386                        bob

387                        bob

388                        bob

389                        bob

390                        bob

391                        bob

392                        bob

393                        bob

394                        bob

395                        bob

396                        bob

397                        bob

398                        bob

399                        bob

1                        bob

2                        bob

3                        bob

4                        bob

5                        bob



Anyone know why this is happening?  Could it just be a timing issue?


Thanks,


-Jason

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>