users
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [cinjug-users] odd db2 insert behavior

To: "'Jason Kretzer/STAR BASE Consulting Inc.'" <JKretzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cinjug-users] odd db2 insert behavior
From: "James Carman" <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 10:02:40 -0400
Delivered-to: mailing list users@cinjug.org
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <OF353E2CD0.00ADF6C6-ON85256E89.004A817E-85256E89.004B46F3@starbaseinc.com>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm
Organization: Carman Consulting, Inc.

As far as style goes, I would use a PreparedStatement for performance AND safety…

 

PreparedStatement ps = connection.prepareStatement( “insert into some_table(some_pri_key,some_other_value) values (?,’bob’)” );

for( int i = 0; i < 400; ++i )

{

  ps.setInt( 1, i );

  ps.executeUpdate();

  connection.commit();

}

 

You should also be using executeUpdate() rather than executeQuery(), if you’re doing an update.  Also, you should probably consider not committing after each insert and putting a bunch of inserts into one commit.

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Kretzer/STAR BASE Consulting Inc. [mailto:JKretzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 9:42 AM
To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cinjug-users] odd db2 insert behavior

 


Good morning all,


I have a class that populates a db2 database.  Here is a basic sample of what I am doing.

for(int i=0; i<400; i++)
{
        stmt.executeQuery("INSERT INTO SOME_TABLE (SOME_PRI_KEY, SOME_OTHER_VALUE) VALUES ("+i+",'bob')");
        connection.commit();
}

First of all, how bad is the style of this?  Secondly, when I insert like this and then get the contents of the table, I get something similar to this


SOME_PRI_KEY        SOME OTHER VALUE
385                        bob
386                        bob
387                        bob
388                        bob
389                        bob
390                        bob
391                        bob
392                        bob
393                        bob
394                        bob
395                        bob
396                        bob
397                        bob
398                        bob
399                        bob
1                        bob
2                        bob
3                        bob
4                        bob
5                        bob


Anyone know why this is happening?  Could it just be a timing issue?

Thanks,

-Jason

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>