users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [cinjug-users] OS/400 Stack Trace Line Numbers Incorrect

To: Brian K Bonner <brian.bonner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,<users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cinjug-users] OS/400 Stack Trace Line Numbers Incorrect
From: <inmanjon@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 12:47:25 +0000
Delivered-to: mailing list users@cinjug.org
Mailing-list: contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm
Total, guess.

Java on the AS/400 can be compiled into native binaries.  One could comple the 
entire JDK if they wanted too.  People do this to avoid garbage collection, and 
it smokes..

> 
> From: Brian K Bonner <brian.bonner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2004/05/17 Mon PM 08:19:18 GMT
> To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cinjug-users] OS/400 Stack Trace Line Numbers Incorrect
> 
> I was wondering if anyone (I'm sure someone is) is doing deployments to 
> OS/400 5R2?  We have a client running Tomcat 4.1.29 on OS/400 5R2 and when 
> we log a stack trace the line numbers don't match up to our source code.
> I'm confident that the code running is the same code we compiled, but for 
> some reason the line numbers are off.
> 
> Has anyone seen anything like this and have an explanation or fix?  We're 
> running JDK 1.4.2_03 (part of the PTFs).
> 
> Thanks,
> - Brian
> 
> ---------
> You may unsubscribe from this mailing list
> by sending a blank email addressed to:
> users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> --
> Find additional help by sending a blank email
> addressed to:
> users-help@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [cinjug-users] OS/400 Stack Trace Line Numbers Incorrect, inmanjon <=