| To: | James Carman <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [cinjug-users] capture xml |
| From: | Eric Bardes <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:38:53 -0400 |
| Cc: | 'Matt Avery' <mavery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Jason Kretzer/STAR BASE Consulting Inc.'" <JKretzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, users@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list users@cinjug.org |
| In-reply-to: | <000701c42714$e76bb000$9051058f@carmani600m> |
| Mailing-list: | contact users-help@cinjug.org; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <40857984.7040703@einnovation.com> <000701c42714$e76bb000$9051058f@carmani600m> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:20:18PM -0400, James Carman wrote: > That's DEFINITELY overkill for this situation. Using the URL class is > sufficient here, as Eric pointed out. I would agree. If your web request uses the GET method it's overkill. POST method, on the other hand. I would point out that in JDK versions 1.3.x and older don't include SSL support. It's a few add-on classes and a config file or two. Without the SSL support, the URL class won't work. There's better howto than I would do justice. Google for JSSE and the first few hits have good info on how to download, install and make it work. Or, use JDK 1.4.x if your standards allow for it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [cinjug-users] Tomcat Question, Greg Nieman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [cinjug-users] Tomcat Question, Robert Fries |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [cinjug-users] capture xml, James Carman |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [cinjug-users] capture xml, James Carman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |