I declare myself the winner...here I go to download my prize.
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Williams [mailto:greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 9:42 AM
To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cinjug-users] RE: list archive, size (was Assistance with
IDEChoice)
Yeah, and s/he can download it him/herself. :-)
Greg
cjbandy@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Agreed. I think that the winner should win the latest version of
Eclipse.
>
>
>>When we switch list servers for CinJUG, I thought we were going to get
>>archiving
>>of messages. That would be very useful for questions like this which
have been
>>recently discussed. Anyone know if we are archiving anywhere?
>>
>>BTW, I can't imagine there's more than 500 folks on this list, but
>>someone who
>>manages the list could check. Maybe we should all guess and closest
guess wins
>>a new IDE ;-)
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Edward Sumerfield [mailto:esumerfd@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>>Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:40 PM
>>To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: [cinjug-users] Assistance with IDE Choice
>>
>>
>>Does anyone know of a program that will maintain a vote count over
>>time. If you
>>revote your original count would go down and the new one goes up.
>>
>>The IDE question is a popular one and it would be nice to have a
>>running vote
>>total to measure the swaying opinions from all of us.
>>
>>How many people participate in the CinJug mailing list? 500? 1000?
>>5000? A vote
>>spread of this volume would be significant. It would be interesting to
watch a
>>new IDE feature cause the bell to sway.
>>
>>To answer the question. I vote Eclipse for all criteria, since your
>>didn't
>>specify which features you were looking for.
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: cjbandy@xxxxxxxxx
>>To: users@xxxxxxxxxx
>>Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:23 PM
>>Subject: [cinjug-users] Assistance with IDE Choice
>>
>>I have been doing some research, on my own, on the various IDE's out
there for
>>Java development. I am trying to understand which one would best
suit me,
>>based on a couple of factors:
>>
>>1. Features
>>2. Reliability
>>3. Cost
>>
>>Does any one have any recommendations?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
**********************************************************************
The content of this email message and any attachments are confidential and may
be legally privileged, intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the
intended recipient, be advised that any use, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and destroy the
message and its attachments.
**********************************************************************
|